Stomping on the sickle

by Eze Eluchie

Do the various sanctions being levied against the Russian Federation by the United States and its European Union allies not qualify as acts of war?

Will Russia be justified in taking drastic actions to protect itself and its peoples from economic, social and political strangulation?

Is there a duty on Russia to ensure that its retaliation is commensurate with the sanctions levied? Or will it be justified in taking any and all measures its leadership deems fit?

Should it not suffice as a cause of worry for those imposing these sanctions that each new set of sanctions, increases President Vladimir Putin’s popularity and approval rating with the Russian population?

Where does sub-Saharan Africa fit in this entire fast developing scenario. What can we get from it (presuming most of those foisted over the continent as rulers have a thinking cap to put on).

We sure do live in interesting and perilous times.

Picture: 'Russian flag'

And the Big Bird fell from the skies….

by Eze Eluchie

The callousness in shooting down a fully laden passenger plane is simply benumbing.

On September 1, 1983, the Air Force of the Soviet Union had shot down Korean Airlines passenger airplane, (KAL) flight 007, killing all 269 passengers on board. In that instance, Flight KAL-007 (an ominous name for a flight) had strayed into sensitive and highly secretive areas of Soviet airspace and according to Soviet authorities failed to heed several warnings to change course. No consequences issued as a result of the massacre of passengers aboard KAL-007.

The downing of Malaysia Airlines with 295 passengers on board, whilst in Ukrainian airspace, certainly constitutes an international crime for which there ought to be severe consequences to whosoever perpetrated the act.

When one realizes that hundreds of ‘Surface-to-air’ missiles, alongside other weapons in the arsenal of the Libyan Armed Forces, were distributed to the Libyan ‘general’ public on the orders of late Libyan dictator, Moamar Qhadafi, during the twilight days of his regime, with some of these weapons in the hands of terror groups (inclusive of Boko Haram, AQIM and Ansaru), the need to up efforts to root out terror became urgent yesterday.

One of the busiest air routes in Africa, and globally, is the Lagos – London corridor, with over 50 weekly flights by an array of domestic and international carriers. The flight path on this route goes through the airspace of such volatile States as Libya, across ungoverned territories in the Sahara Desert and very much within the reach of Al Qaida in the Islamic Maghreb and several fringe elements in the region.

Is there a likelihood of a domestic or international flight in Nigeria, or elsewhere in sub-Saharan Africa being downed by Boko Haram, Al Shabaab or the myriad of terror groups in the region?

Do these terror groups possess the capacity and desire to execute such a heinous act?

If, as I believe, the answers to the above questions are in the affirmative, what remedial actions can be taken to forestall such copy-cat acts of terror?

If timely action is not taken to frontally confront terror groups across sub-Saharan Africa, it will not be a matter of 'if', but 'when', with regards to one of our Big Birds being brought down, with high human fatalities, by these fringe elements. 

In the light of the MH-17 massacre, there is an urgent need to enhance and strengthen the near non-existent Public Airspace safety infrastructure across Africa. 

Picture: One of the shoulder-held surface-to-air missiles carted away from Libyan Army arsenal, now in the possession of terrorists across sub-Saharan Africa.

Acting out the script of The Islamic State.

by Eze Eluchie

The initial kidnap and murder of 3 Israeli Jews (Naftali Fraenkel, Gil-Ad Shaer and Eyal Yifrah), was claimed by a little-known group by the name ‘The Islamic State’ – Hamas, most uncharacteristically, denied involvement in the dastardly act;

The retaliatory kidnap and murder of a Palestine youth (Muhammad Abu Khdeir) was similarly, most sinister and devilish. Ordinarily the retaliation took out the wind from Israeli Prime Minister Netanyahu’s railing to ensure that the perpetrators of the kidnap and murder of the 3 Jewish youths were brought to justice, even if it meant razing all of Gaza.

How did the region descend to the current spate of bombardments resulting in the death of over 100 Palestine civilians?

Israel and Hamas (and gradually, the broader Arab and Islamic populations) are gradually being enticed into a war both sides did not plan or prepare for, and I suspect least have any idea as to how it will roll out or eventually end, or what will translate as ‘victory’ for either side.

Who stands to gain from the present face-off in Gaza? The entity which at the very onset claimed to have instigated the crisis – The Islamic State!

With a continuation and broadening of the conflict beyond Gaza, The Islamic State would have created sufficient diversionary cover to allow it to continue to consolidate and expand its scope of influence beyond its present territory straddling Iraq and Syria, probably inching into Jordan and improbably, Saudi Arabia. The longer the present conflict in Gaza lasts, and as the death toll of children and women and non-combatants in Gaza continue to escalate, the easier it will be for the Islamic State to justify its existence and need for support from millions of Muslims across the world.

The ongoing indiscriminate bombardment of Gaza is despicable, unwarranted and uncalled for – it certainly cannot be called a ‘war’.  The retaliatory missile attacks by Hamas into Israel ought to cease forthwith.

The only winner from the ongoing conflict will be Abu Bakar al-Bagdadi and his Islamic State. Israel and Hamas/the Palestinians are apparently playing out a devious script crafted by The Islamic State. 

Picture: Abu Bakr al-Bagdadi, leader of the Islamic State