Thursday, December 24, 2015

The Worst Nigerian Awards for Year 2015

by Eze Eluchie

As we continually ponder over why Nigeria, as an entity, continues to barely exist in the pitiable state (economically, politically, socially and otherwise) that we find ourselves, despite the limitless opportunities and potentials for greatness and meaningful contribution to humanity embedded in the country, it is important that those elements that have contributed to societal debasement and retrogression be identified, named and shamed with the dual hope that they will, on the one hand, thereafter reflect on their role in our collective sorrow and hopefully change their vile acts and mannerisms and on the other hand, acquaint the population in Nigeria about those who have contributed immensely to ‘why we are where we are whilst the rest of the world keeps on forging ahead’ and allow the people to decide what to do with such precursors of underdevelopment.

For this 3rd Edition of the Worst of Nigeria Awards for Year 2016, there will, as in the previous year’s, be in 4 categories, to wit: The Worst Corporate Entity, The Worst Governor/State Agency, The Worst Federal Minister/Agency, and the grand prize, The Worst Nigerian. And the winners, on account of the anguish they have caused tthe Nigerian State and its citizens, they are actually sore losers, are as follows:


The Worst Corporate Entity:
When a corporate body rakes in millions of dollars in profits from a hapless population, manufacturing, distributing and disingenuously marketing a product that when used exactly as the corporate giant intends it to be used, will sicken, debilitate, destroy vital organs in the human body and ultimately kill not only the user of the corporate giants products but also others who have the misfortune of being around the users of such products, then such erring corporate giant has sunk low enough to merit the Award been accorded it here.
Some may be wondering whether such a company fitting the vile description above does actually exist and which product does nothing than harm its users when used as intended by the manufacturer.

Wonder no further, the winner of the year 2016 Worst Corporate Entity is British America Tobacco Plc.  The product in question is Cigarette!


The Worst Governor/State Agency.
In a contraption where most State Governors have unlawfully and criminally appropriated funds meant for the tier of government closest to the people, the Local Government Councils, to their personal use, in the process denying a vast majority of the population any meaningful benefits in almost two decades of supposedly democratic governance, it will take exceptional depravity, con and deviousness for any particular Governor to sink below his peers in their quest to dehumanize and vanquish the citizens over whom they administer.
By elevating fraud, doublespeak and trickery as cardinal principles of governance; implementing strident efforts at destroying the basic institutions (Town Development Unions) which citizens of his State had applied to cushion the effect of abandonment by government authorities; unconstitutionally and unlawfully deploying State Legislators as ‘caretakers’ of Local Government Councils in the State; claiming that the people of the State he is supposed to preside over are owing him a stupendous sum of over US$80 Million (for spurious ‘security votes’ which he claims to be entitled to); the Imo State Governor who has been christened ‘Ekwuo ozor, eme ozor’ (He who says something and does something else) by the people of Imo State, Mr. Rochas Okorocha, wins the Award in the category of ‘The Worst Governor/State Agency’.


The Worst Federal Minister/Federal Agency
Top contenders for this award included the National Electricity Regulatory Commission (NERC) which is superintending over the notorious scamming of Nigerian electricity consumers by power companies who shamelessly levy households and premises for electricity not supplied; the Economic and Financial Crimes Commission (EFCC) which seems fixated with its role as a hound dog to target its investigative and prosecutorial powers over corruption cases on only persons perceived to be opposed to the regime in power to , and the Nigerian Military (particularly the Nigeria Army under the headship of present Chief of Army Staff, General Buratai) which seems unschooled on the role of the Military in quelling demonstration and generally interacting with the civil populace in a democratic dispensations – a situation that has led to the military killing several demonstrators (pro-Biafra activists in Onitsha {Anambra State, South East Nigeria}, Shi’ia demonstrators in Zaria {Kaduna State, North Central Nigeria}

In a polity where State agencies meant to serve the people are notoriously self-serving, nominations for this Award category are expectedly not lacking.

The Federal Ministers, who were appointed belatedly have exhibited shocking blandness, colorlessness and lack of creativity in their respective Ministries as one would have expected them to, in view of the lateness in their appointments, hit the ground running. The fact that seven months into an administration, none of its principal officers can be assessed tells the tale of where Nigeria is.

The Federal Agency whose incompetence, mismanagement and mishandling of its duties has caused more harm to Nigeria and Nigerians in year 2015 and which this wins the award in this category is the Independent National Electoral Commission (INEC) – an agency  which somehow, despite its limitless finances, always finds a way to botch any and all elections it has conducted over the past one year, in the process short-changing the population and serving as a conduit to impose misfits as rulers over the Nigerian state, rises above the field of failed Federal Agencies.


The Worst Nigerian
The role of leadership in moving any society forward cannot be adequately quantified. With effective leadership, a third rate economy (or 3rd world country – whatever you construe this to mean)) can be transformed over a very short period into a leading player in global affair. The converse is unfortunately, also true.

In Nigeria, we have for virtually all of year 2015 being denied any signs of effective leadership at the national level. For the first 4 months, the then President, Goodluck Jonathan was embroiled in very distractive and strenuous efforts at securing a re-elections, this was followed by a 5th month of wasteful transition processes and since May 29th when the incumbent stepped into office, the country has virtually run on auto-pilot and “body-language of the President”), without any recognizable policy thrusts or directions of governance save for the worn out recourse to sloganeering and blaming all ills on the immediate past administration.   

In other climes desirous of progress, the Civil Society Organizations would have risen up to the occasion to ensure that political leaders (in Nigeria it is actually rulers in control) are held accountable and made to serve the people. From the labour Unions, to the National Association of Nigerian Students, the ‘human right organization’, good governance and pro-democracy organizations, entities who should serve as the eyes, ears and minds of a largely illiterate and population have sold out their constituents for lucre.  

In Nigeria, rather pitiably, the Civil Society sector has been sucked into the rot which permeates the system. Objectivity has given way to parochialism; the intellect inherent in Civil Society is pandered to the highest bidder for partisan and non-altruistic ends, in the process denying our population, country and indeed the African continent the benefits of a working Nigeria. Of particular mention here are the Civil Society organizations which ‘monitor’ and issue ‘accolades’ or ‘condemnation’ (in keeping with the desires of their foreign funders) over the fiasco we refer to as elections in our clime.

As a collective, for failing the people, the Worst Nigerian Award for Year 2016 goes to so-called “pro-democracy and good governance” Civil Society organizations.



Picture: The Worst of Nigeria Award Trophy


Monday, December 21, 2015

MTN Fine Imbroglio: A National Disgrace!

by Eze Eluchie

What we had hailed on this Page as a mark of seriousness on the path of the Nigerian Presidency, under the ‘saint’ Muhammadu Buhari regime, in addressing disregard by foreign corporations of domestic laws and norms in Nigeria is fast turning into a national embarrassment, an expensive mockery on Nigeria’s sovereignty and one more reason why we are where we are and the rest of the world keeps on forging ahead.

Why will Nigeria’s Minister of Communication trivialize and politicize the fine levied on MTN by the Nigerian Communications Commission (NCC), for breaching regulatory provisions regarding registration of telephone numbers, by stating that final decision on whether the fine gets paid or not, lies at with the President, ‘saint’ Muhammadu Buhari?

Globally, such political interference in what is basically commercial decisions by regulatory commissions serve to diminish the stature of such regulatory commissions and portray the country concerned as a jurisdiction where the Head of Government is a 'strongman' and institutions and practices of State are at the whims of the political rulers.

Till date, MTN, despite the expiry of the time fixed to pay the fine, a cowardly bungling and 50% reduction of the fine by the NCC/’saint’ Buhari and the telecommunication giants continued failure to pay any part whatsoever of the fine imposed, MTN continues to do business in Nigeria as though nothing (and really nothing except for noise from the NCC) transpired.

Wither the once touted ‘giant of Africa’?

Earlier blogpost on the MTN Fine affair:



Picture: NCC Headquarter complex, Abuja, Nigeria.


Wednesday, December 16, 2015

Saudi Arabia-led Islamic Military Alliance To Fight Terrorism – A Diversionary Non-Starter!

by Eze Eluchie

Considering that Nigeria, like some of the West African countries mentioned as members of the 'alliance', is a secular State with a minority Muslim (or as is the case for some of the African countries purported to be part of the alliance, sizable non-Muslim) population;

And further considering that Islamic countries with majority Shi’ia sect members (Iran and Iraq) and Syria were excluded from the so-called Saudi Arabia-led Islamic Military Alliance;

And also considering that the announcement of Nigeria’s membership of the Sunni Muslim (Saudi Arabia)-led Islamic Military Alliance was made a day after Nigerian soldiers slaughtered dozens of Shi’ia Muslim adherents in Zaria, Kaduna State, northern Nigeria:

And ultimately considering the opaque and largely non-committal stance of the Saudis, thus far, in efforts at curtailing extremist Islamic terror;

Would Christian or Muslims of the Shi’ia sect or persons of other faiths (not Islamic), serving in the Nigeria military (or the military of the other 34-countries purported to be part of the alliance), be expected to participate in this Saudi Arabia-led Islamic Military Alliance?

Would such a refusal to be deployed or serve under such a Saudi Arabia-led Islamic Military Alliance amount to conscientious objection to serve?

Would the Nigerian National Assembly or other legislators of other secular states or states with substantial non-Muslim populations really serve under such Saudi Arabia-led Islamic Military Alliance?

The pertinent question in the face of realities and the solo-announcement of the alliance by just the Saudi Foreign Minister (without any of the coalition partners present) is: was the Saudi announcement of an ‘Islamic anti-terror Military Alliance/Coalition genuine or merely diversionary?  

The idea of a Saudi Arabia-led Islamic Military Alliance is a diversionary non-starter from the very onset!




Picture: Saudi Deputy Crown Price and Defence Minister, Mohammed bin Salman, who announced the ‘alliance’.


Tuesday, December 15, 2015

The Slaughter of the Shi'a by Nigerian troops: Opening Fresh Vistas of Violence

by Eze Eluchie

Having perused the accounts of the authorities of the Nigerian Army on the slaughter of Shi’a Muslim followers of Sheikh Zakzaky in Zaria, Kaduna State (North Central Nigeria), which sought to justify the use of life bullets and mass slaughter of several dozen Shi’a protesters who blocked a road, denying the Chief of Army Staff passage, one is forced to wonder if there was no other alternative resolution to the impasse created by the blockage than to kill and maim so many.  

When one realizes that during the electioneering campaigns preceding the last presidential elections, the convoy of the then sitting President, Goodluck Jonathan, which had much more fire power and reason to unleash lethal force on a mob after been pelted with stones by an enraged mob, opted to hastily seek alternative routes to avoid what would have been a massacre in Bauchi, one is forced to inquire as follows with regards to the carnage which played out in Zaria:

1. What was so important on that particular trip by the Chief of Army Staff as to necessitate the wastage and maiming of so many?

2. Faced with clear consequences of shooting into an unruly mob, why did the convoy of the Chief of Army Staff not either turn back, seek alternative routes or solution than to resort to the mass slaughter?

3. After having cleared the road to enable the Chief of Army Staff ‘safe passage’, was it also necessary to extend the pursuit of the fleeing Shi’a to the residence of their leader, where more causalities occurred?

4. Considering that the rise in Boko Haram terrorism is attributed to the killings by our security operatives of the erstwhile leaders of the then Boko Haram Islamic organization, was it wise to have gone on another killing spree when Nigeria is still striving to contain the consequences of earlier killings?  

5. Was it deemed conducive to kill so many Shi’a merely on account of the fact that they are a minority Islamic sect?

6. Would a similar action have been taken if those ‘blocking the safe passage’ had been members of the Sunni sect, the dominant sect amongst the Muslim population in Nigeria?

7. Will the killings in of Shi’a adherents in Zaria by our military authorities not unwittingly expose our already stretched facilities by unwittingly importing the fratricidal Shi’a-Sunni rivalry, currently playing out in the Middle East, into Nigeria?

8. Considering the continuing terror activities in the North-East zone, the threats to return to the creeks and violence of the Niger Delta militants, the ongoing quest for self-actualization and sovereignty in the South-East, and the wait-and-see attitude adopted by the South-West to committing to the Nigeria project, is it really wise for the military to open a new vista of discontent?

To the Nigerian Army, these killings were unlawful, unconscionable, unnecessarily provocative  and wrong. Caution, caution and more caution is advocated.

Let us peacefully restructure and renegotiate the Nigerian polity whilst there is yet time.




Picture: Corpses of some Shi’a followers of Sheikh el Zakzaky killed in Zaria (13th December 2015). 


Wednesday, December 9, 2015

Killings of Biafra Activists: Restructure and Renegotiate Nigeria Now!

by Eze Eluchie,

Today, 16,764 days after the ‘official’ end of the Biafran genocide on the 15th of January 1970, the very first person of Igbo nationality to be killed by bullets of Nigeria Government security forces in the quest for a renegotiation and restructuring of the Nigerian contraption and the actualization of Biafra, 20 year old Miss. Anthonia Nkirika Ikeanyionwu, will be laid to rest today at Amaolu, Adazi Unukwu in Anambra State.

Several others were killed and others maimed by bullets, alongside Miss Ikeanyionwu, in a vicious crack down by security operatives on peaceful demonstrators in Onitsha, Anambra State (within the territtory of the erstwhile Republic of Biafra) on 2nd December 2015.

Over 2 million Igbos had been killed during the Biafran genocide which occurred in the course of the Nigeria-Biafra civil war from  6th July 1967 to 15th January 1970.

The well publicized comments by Nigeria’s current ruler and former dictator, Alhaji Muhammadu Buhari, to met out unequal and unfair treatment to peoples who gave him ‘5% votes’ during the last presidential elections (a category to which the Igbo nation belongs), has further exacerbated tension along ethnic lines.

May we not repeat the mistakes of times past.

Let us peacefully restructure and renegotiate the Nigeria contraption whilst we can.



Video of one of several atrocities committed by Nigeria troops during the Biafra genocide:


Nigeria President, Muhammadu Buhari’s resolve to unfairly treat areas of Nigeria which gave him ‘5% votes’ during his (s)election.



Picture: Obituary announcement/Burial program for the late Miss. Anthonia Nkiruka Ikeanyionwu:


Wednesday, December 2, 2015

When Rulers Get Summoned.

by Eze Eluchie

Why do some of these African rulers do these things to themselves and the territories they supposedly represent?

There certainly are some leaders in Africa who will never condescend to the imagery and reality depicted in the picture below. 

A couple of African rulers (not leaders) seated like naughty school kids being drilled by the Head-teacher, Ban ki Moon – does Alhaji Muhammadu Buhari (Nigeria), John Mahama (Ghana) and their ilk, soberly seated before Mr. Moon, realize that the UN Secretary General is a public servant whose salary and upkeep comes from the contributions of UN-member States, including the African countries?

Most probably, from this session with the UN Scribe, the rulers will take off en-mass to respond to a summons from the Heads of Governments of Brazil, Australia or wheresoever. Mass summons previously honoured with alacrity by African rulers have included invites from the US, France, Britain, India and China.

In all these foreign trips of highly doubtful benefits to the home territories of these rulers, one direct benefit to the globetrotters who often travel in state-of –the-art private jets, is that they never forget to purchase a couple of choice real estates in the countries they visit whilst ceaselessly complaining about their handicap in being unable to harness the rich potentials over which they preside.

The people have to take their destinies in their own hands if they ever want to see the light of day.




Picture: Some African rulers being drilled by UN Secretary General, Ban Ki Moon.


Tuesday, December 1, 2015

Needed to End ISIS: Regime Change in Turkey!

by Eze Eluchie

The world is gradually waking up to the reality of the connections between Turkey President, Tayyip Recep  Erdogan and ISIS.

By his shoot-down of the Russian fighter jet, Turkish President Erdogan had deliberately tried to pitch NATO in direct confrontation with Russia and thereby destroy the growing coalition of humanity to destroy ISIS which was evolving after the dastardly twin attacks on Russian passenger plane and the mass attacks on Paris soon thereafter.

From his antics during the ISIS onslaught on Kobani, to his relentless attacks on the Kurdish Peshmerga forces anytime the Kurds were in the offensive against ISIS, to serving as major conduits for sale of crude oil from ISIS controlled areas and as transit route for Western youths willing to join ISIS, to the quite revealing effort to instigate division against efforts at uniting against ISIS, the connections between Erdogan and ISIS had been out in the open for all to see for damn too long, yet most had missed it.

The first step to addressing the ISIS nightmare is a regime-change in Turkey.

Prior blogpost on Erdogan-ISIS links:
http://ezeluchie.blogspot.com.ng/2014/10/a-justiciable-responsibility-to-prevent.html



Picture: Mr. Tayyip Erdogan