by Eze Eluchie
Growing up
as a lad in the suburbs of a city that was to later metamorphose into the most
populous city in sub-Sahara Africa (depending on whose population figures you
opt to believe), one quickly learnt that the most important lessons in life
were not taught in schools or classrooms but informally on the streets.
One of such
lessons learned was the fundamental need to take turns at play or whatsoever –
a lesson learnt whilst playing with peers. Another, and perhaps more critical
lesson, was the practice of, with a view to avoiding repayment obligations,
putting up a quarrel with ones creditors, and using the guise of the ensuing
acrimonious relationship as fodder to refuse to pay back due debts.
A childhood
acquaintance of mine had become so adept at this second lesson described above
that some of us had to practically flee from him whensoever he tried to make
trouble with us – he had formed the uncanny habit of picking up quarrels with
whomsoever amongst his friends when he either had some treats on him or was in
high anticipation of getting some goodies from some of his older siblings or
relatives. In one particular instance, seeing that his efforts to catch up with
us to pick a quarrel had failed, our rascal friend crawled back to his mum in a
fit of hysterical tears, crying that he would now be forced to share the sweets
in his pocket because none of us was ready to quarrel with him.
No doubt,
the relationship between States often times imitates what transpires in
inter-personal relationships. When however pranks by youngsters gets replicated
in inter-States relationships, with a potential to adversely impact global
peace and commerce, then there is sufficient course for concern for all
interested in the well-being of the human race. The worry takes on added impetus
when the countries involved are global powers with stockpiles of nuclear
warheads sufficient to annihilate planet Earth.
It is with the
forgoing in perspective that one considers the increasing foray by elements of the
United States military, under the guise of operating in international waters,
into the volatile waters of the South China seas, an area that has gained
notoriety as a constant source of friction between China and several of its neighbors
amongst which include Malaysia, Philippines and Vietnam.
The past few
months has witnessed noticeably increased numbers of close contacts between US
and Chinese military personnel and equipment in the waters of the South China
seas. One can only speculate that it not an issue of if, but when, one of these
close contacts will result in the firing of anti-aircraft missiles and or
torpedoes, and or the death of a few service men and worse escalations between
these two global super powers. aerial
and naval interceptions b
The excuse
given by US authorities as justification for their forays into the South China
Seas sounds as hallow as it is porous – loyalty to allies/obligations under bilateral military protection treaties
and protection of international trading routs, indeed. If these were truly the
case, one would wonder why there is no similar efforts at protecting
international bilateral military protection agreements and efforts at
protecting international trading routes, one would wonder why similar proactive
measures were not deemed worthy around the territories of Russia, Yemen, Iran
and Syria.
Could the
interest in provoking conflict with China be with a view to frustrating the redemption
of the over U.S.$1.22 Trillion owed to the land of the ancient Dragons by the US?
Certainly in the event of an outbreak of
conflict between the US and China, the Chinese may as well kiss goodbye to the trillion
dollar debt owed them by the US, unless of course in the very unlikely scenario
that both countries emerge from such conflict with the Chinese being a position
to enforce collection of such debts.
Perhaps,
like we did as kids growing up in the suburbs of Lagos, it is in the best
interest of the Chinese to keep on running away from provocative acts. Unfortunately, knowing the
psyche of the Chinese, running away from conflict cannot be a permanent
vocation – they are bound, sooner than later, to stand up and seek to defend their integrity.
The ensuing conflagration will be severe.
The ensuing conflagration will be severe.
Picture: Flags of US and China
No comments:
Post a Comment