by Eze Eluchie,
The recent arraignment, admission of guilt and conviction of Ahmad
al-Faqi al-Mahdi, a member of the Taureg extremist Islamist militia, Ansar
Dine, before the International Court of Justice on charges of committing ‘crimes
against culture’ via the destruction of ancient religious artifacts, structures
and literature and ‘historical monuments or buildings dedicated to religion’, as
a war crime in contravention of Article 8(b)ix of the Rome Statute, is a
monumental and welcome development in international criminal law.
The recognition that when a peoples culture is destroyed,
their very being, existence and life is depreciated, irreversibly diminished,
thrown into turmoil and their ability to make meaningful progress adversely
impacted, ranking pari passu with such other vile acts as genocides, mass rapes
and systematic torture amongst several other war crimes, will serve to put into
proper context similar crimes against culture committed elsewhere which have
seemingly been overlooked by civilizations and mankind.
The recent prosecution for ‘crime against culture’ and the
rationale given as reason for the landmark prosecution of the Malian terrorist
in question by the ICC, should serve as a prism through which the world may yet
begin to understand the extent of harm inflicted upon and suffered by the
so-called emerging economies and countries and brings to mind the wrongs done
to the various peoples of the African continent by foreign missionary and
colonialists who traversed the continent.
For centuries, crimes against culture were perpetuated
against several indigenous peoples, particularly across Sub-Sahara Africa, with
such high level of impunity and brazenness that the heinous crimes gained
currency as norms. One prime activity Islamic and Christian missionaries who
first set foot on Sub-Sahara African soil engaged in was the systematic desecration
and ultimately destruction of traditional symbols of religious and temporal
authority, artifacts and whatsoever items that served for purposes of communal
identification, unity and cohesion of the various peoples and communities they
sought to conquer, convert, rule and or colonize.
An integral part of the political conquest (under the guise
of colonization) of the indigenous people who own the various territories the
colonialists seized was the total annihilation of whatsoever traditional
instruments of authority and or religion/worship of ‘colonized peoples’ – in other
words, colonization in a nutshell, was a prolonged Crime Against Culture, a
prolonged War Crime.
This practice of destruction of people’s cultural heritage
and identity has rather than abate, continued till date with greater frenzy and
violence – at times supported by instrument of State authority. Till date Islamic and Christian groups, acting independently of one another but unified by their hatred of traditional culture and religions, take pride in public destruction of Traditional Masquerades, Religious Charms and Amulets, and Shrines dedicated to various Gods in traditional communities. Ironically, some
States in Sub-Sahara Africa acting under the influence of the two religious
bodies which institutionalized crime against culture in the continent, now
serve as instruments to deepen crimes against culture against their own
peoples, passing legislation's which seek to ‘criminalize’ traditional heritage,
indigenous cultural practices and religions.
Considering that the devastation and harm caused by crimes
against culture is a continuum, and that the crimes were so endemic and coordinated
as to be deemed to be perpetuated in perpetuity, it would be interesting to know
what the opinion of the Prosecutor of the International Criminal Court and the
ICC itself would be towards investigating and ultimately prosecuting the principal
custodians of the Islamic and Christian faiths and the present beneficiaries of
years of commission of crimes against culture against peoples of Sub-Sahara
Africa (to wit: the King of Saudi Arabia/Custodian of the Two Holy Temples
{Islam}, the Pope of the Catholic Church and the Head of the Church of
England/Anglican Communion {Christians}, and the complicit governments.
If the destruction of one mosque in Timbuktu will result into
a conviction for Crime Against Culture, how would the ICC treat the obliteration
of a peoples religion, culture and way of life?
Picture:
A traditional masquerade (representative of the Gods) amongst the Igbo ethnic
nationality in Nigeria.
Superb
ReplyDelete