Tuesday, July 23, 2013

Does Pope Francis have a death wish?

By Eze Eluchie

Does Pope Francis have a death wish?

Watching the Pope traverse down the Streets of Rio in a Fiat vehicle with his windows wound down, huge crowds swarming all around him, with some even reaching into the vehicle to touch the pontiff, what surely represents a nightmare to the operatives charged with papal security, one wonders if indeed the Pope appreciates who, what and where he is.

With the number of cranks all over the world; persons who want to enter the record books for whatsoever reasons; and the several conspiracies being unraveled in the Catholic Church (inclusive of the perpetual mess at the Institute  for the Works of Religion – Vatican Bank), candidates willing to have a go at Pope Francis are simply not lacking.    

As I wish Pope Francis a safe and peaceful journey, I could not but notice the fact that the Pope had traveled to Brazil using an Alitalia airplane which the Vatican had leased from the carrier for that purpose. Considering the Popes mode of transportation, I cast my mind back to our local smart alecs con-men all across sub-Saharan Africa, who, using the instrumentality of religion, hoodwink the majority of their countrymen to part with whatever little resources they have, to fund the purchase of exotic limousines and private jets to enable the ‘men-of-god’ junket the globe.

Here was the Pope, who, considering the resources of the Catholic Church, could afford a fleet of Airbus A380 jets and an own brand of luxury vehicles, opting to ‘rent’. Whilst our tin-god charlatans, who are allowed to continue in their perfidy by State authorities as a means of mass obfuscation, scam the living day lights out of us and purchase all manner of luxury vehicles and jets with their loot.

As Nigerians would say in our local version of the English language, ‘God go punish devil’.


Picture: Pope Francis vehicle mobbed in the streets of Rio de Janeiro


Monday, July 22, 2013

Restructure, Renegotiate, not Re-Destroy!

by Eze Eluchie

As the Nigerian contraption approaches its centenary (since the 1914 amalgamation of three entities, to wit: the Northern Protectorate, Southern Protectorate and Colony of Lagos into a single entity by British colonial authorities), the internal dynamics which has continually seen its various component factors, ethnic, religious and social, pitched in perpetual conflict, one against the other, appears to be approaching a climax.

I have been repeatedly asked as to why I refer to my country as a ‘contraption’. The answer is trite. That is simply what Nigeria truthfully is – a contraption. Referring to Nigeria as either a ‘nation’ or a federation’ would tantamount to telling a lie, as the country is neither! There is however nothing wrong in being a contraption – many nations today started off as contraptions, such as the former Union of the Soviet Socialist Republics (USSR) and the United States of America (US) which started off as a contraption of 13 British colonies. The problem is however what you do with your contraption.

With regards to the US, its founding fathers, worked hard towards transforming their contraption into the behemoth success it is today, setting in motion policies and practices which sought to integrate the various diverse peoples and cultures in their contraption into one homogeneous entity. Transformation from contraption into nationhood is however a continuum, as can be gleaned at from the racial-tensions which continue to blight the American dream.

Ours on the converse has been most retrogressive. From a contraption which saw ourselves as divided along three distinct geopo0litical lines in 1914, divisive colonial rule and its attendant legacies, left us sharply divided along myriad ethnic and religious lines by the time of ‘political independence’ in 1960.

Since ‘independence’, rulership under a primitive, thieving and self-destructive ‘elite’ class who, as a collective, seem to derive joy in inflicting hardship on their fellow co-travelers in the contraption has further widened the gulf between the various peoples of Nigeria into over 36 States, 774 local enclaves, a multiplicity of religious sects and denominations and now sexual/marital preferences. In a bid to retain a stranglehold on power, the rulers manipulate peoples who had previously felt some form of amity into blood enemies; brothers are turned against brothers; and brethrens against brethrens.

The worrisome state of our contraption has engendered despondency amongst the populace. All manners of separatist organizations (most of these are actually pseudo-businesses, as the leaders of such groups smile home to the bank on the back of the hapless coerced membership and the silence of the enlightened), each laying a bogus claim to representing one segment of the contraption or the other, have sprung up to feast on the decay.

If we were to go the way the various ‘separatist pseudo-businesses’ are clamoring, virtually every family group will be a republic unto itself – a travesty that will leave each and every of such new entities at the mercy of larger and more entrenched players in a new world order where might is increasingly becoming right. Moreover, as can be gleaned at from the modus operandi of these ‘separatist pseudo-businesses’, the people such groups claim to represents will fare far worse under the dictatorship of the ethnic war-lords in the event of an all out splitting of the contraption.

Resulting from inept rulership being experienced in all strata of governance, more easily noticeable at the center because of the overconcentration of resources there, too much innocent blood has been, and continues to be shed, to sustain our contraption. Certainly, it is better to be alive in family-group republic than to be a corpse in the gigantean contraption

Do we throw in the towel? Certainly not!

My persistent call for restructuring and renegotiation of the contraption is being cunningly re-crafted, reconstructed and presented to the populace, by a more lethal and dangerous band of kleptocrats posturing as ‘progressives’ and their cohorts comprised mainly of rejects from the ruling party, as a call to merely replace the present crop of rulers at the federal level.

Let me be explicitly clear in this instance: rather than falling into the trap being spawned by the band of opportunists led by and comprised of certificate forgers who see nothing wrong in placing their entire families and bootlickers in different political offices, ethno-religious extremists who are out of touch with our present realities and have no affinity across geo-political divides, and discredited criminal elements who after fleecing public coffers in the offices they were opportune to be appointed/(s)elected into now turn around and have the temerity to deem themselves as ‘opposition/progressives’ described in the preceding paragraph, we will be far better off continuing with the status quo (at the Federal level)! If the nightmarish probability of falling into the trap was to ever occur, it will tantamount to a re-destruction of the contraption.

My call has been for a restructuring and renegotiation of the contraption and certainly not for a re-destruction.

Goodluck Jonathan now simply has to buckle up!

Agreed Jonathan came into office primarily on the basis of the virtues enshrined in his and his wife’s first names (Goodluck and Patience); Further agreed that entrenched interests who had fed fat from the blood and resources of Nigerians and Nigeria had assured Jonathan upon his electoral victory in May 2011 that they will make Nigeria ungovernable for him; Also agreed that these same ‘opposition’/’progressives’ have unleashed benumbing violence on a scale unprecedented in the history of any African country against the polity to ensure public ill-will within the contraption;  The reality remains that for now, someone occupies the office of President of the Federal Republic, and that person should act accordingly.

In the interim, and certainly before any further pretense at national elections, Nigerians should be allowed the opportunity to discuss the framework for the continued existence of our contraption with a view to ensuring peaceful coexistence of peoples not only within our contraption but also forestall upheavals that will, with all certainty, impact negatively on the entire West and Central African regions.

Time is running out!




Picture: Anger in the land. An explosion in Nigeria will present a humanitarian disaster as has never before been seen anywhere since the end of WWII


Saturday, July 20, 2013

The Senate was right: A 'married woman' is of 'full age'!

By Eze Eluchie

The seeming uproar against the vote by the Nigerian Senate to retain the constitutional provision which accords a 'married woman' the rights and privileges of a 'Nigerian of full age', is as astonishing as it is diversionary.

It is preposterous to suggest that a married woman, who is deemed capable of consummating her marriage, enjoying the various privileges of marriage accorded under our laws and has the potential of bringing forth new life, is not of full age.

The ideal position for those worried about the Senate vote, should have been to insist on a minimum age for marriage - and not to seek a constitutional review to deny a married woman the right of being deemed of 'full age'!

The Nigerian Senate was right to have rejected the alteration.

The reasons given by the Senate for which it rejected the alteration is, however, most dubious.

In the course of the Nigerian Senate's session debating the issue, a Senator and former Governor of Zamfara State (Mr. Ahmed Sani Yerima), who has the double sinister distinction of initiating the application of a flawed form of Shari'a laws as State law in Nigeria and a penchant to use the garb of Islam to mask his pedophilic inclinations (he infamously paid an incredulous huge dowry to marry an under-14 year old girl), flew the 'religion flag' as justification for the retention of Section 29(4){b} of the 1999 Constitution - The section in contention provides that a 'married woman' qualifies as a Nigerian of 'full age' for purposes of renunciation of citizenship or otherwise. The issues at stake had been whether a minor who was married was a person of 'full age'

With regards to the purported marriage of Prophet Mohammed (sallallahu alaihi wasallam - peace be upon him) to then 6-year old Aisha bin Abibakr (umm al-mu'minin - mother of the believers), a marriage which was consummated when Aisha was 9-years old, there may be the need to either distinguish the cultural practices in ancient Arabia from  Islamic injunctions or insist that religious practices must conform with the dictates of modernity.

Let energies be focused on real issues (in this instance, ensuring an acceptable minimum age for marriage) and not chase improbable shadows as the present campaign of calumny being waged against the Senate of the Federal Republic over a vote which is on all fours with good reason and reality, is unfortunate. It presents some elements of the Nigerian civil society as being too eager to lampoon the system, without any just cause.

If the unfounded attacks on the upper Legislative chamber over this present issue continues, credibility will be lost by those who engage in such despicable conduct. Our Legislators (and the entire system for that matter) have gross issues, let constructive criticism be reserved for such instances. Not this episode!

Some civil society organizations are understandably making hue and cry over the instant Senate vote with a view to impress their foreign funders - do not worry so much, the donor agencies already understand the realities highlighted in this post. Get back to work, more issues of national import are afoot.

As further evidence that our contraption is in dire need of renegotiation and restructuring, one is appalled by the inelegant draftsmanship which went into producing a most flawed Constitution of doubtful veracity as evidenced by the provisions of the entirety of Section 29 of the Constitution.





Picture: Senator Ahmed Sani Yerima who infamously married an under aged Egyptian bride and successfully led the campaign for the retention of Section 29(4){b}of the 1999 Nigerian Constitution. This character, whilst helping himself to millions of dollars in public funds as Governor also presided over the amputation of limbs of ;petty thieves' under a skewed application of Shari'a (Islamic) laws in Zamfara State.