Saturday, August 23, 2014

The new phase of terror – The Suicidal Bio-Terrorist.

by Eze Eluchie

Whilst countries on the front-line of terror have spent, and continue to spend, billions of dollars fortifying their military defense systems; training and retraining their security personnel on evolving patterns and approaches to tackling violent terror groups; sensitizing their citizenry on the individuals role in identifying and supporting the States efforts at combating terror; and increasing international collaboration and information sharing strategies to addressing a scourge that is becoming an increasing blight to our humanity; a new and rather innocuous form of terror, with equal, if not more devastating effects as the violent terrorists, crept into our consciousness – the Suicidal Bio-terrorist, a person who gets into another entities territory, imbued with and terminally afflicted by biological agents and intent on causing maximum fatalities and harm by spreading the offensive agent!

The notion of suicidal bio-terrorists, previously restricted to fiction novels, has for over two decades now, attracted the attention of various global powers inclusive of the United States Army which has devoted enormous resources and undertaken extensive research on the topic, particularly on the issue of release of viruses using human or animal vectors. The US Army, had ironically, delved deep into the prospect of using such viral disease agents as Ebola as a tool for the suicidal bio-terrorist of the future.

Currently beleaguered by ‘regular’ terror attacks from Boko Haram, for Nigeria, in the course of the current outbreak of the Ebola Virus Disease (EVD) ravaging countries in the extreme western flanks of West Africa, the fiction of a Suicidal Bio-Terrorist has metamorphosed into reality.

The example of Patrick Sawyer, the Liberian-American who served as human vector to transport EVD into Nigeria is worthy of understudy by persons interested in confronting this new brand of terrorism. Indisputable and publicly verifiable details of the Sawyer-episode include:
*Mr. Sawyer who had contracted EVD during his regular visits to his sister (who later died of the disease) in Monrovia, was suspended by his employers to prevent him from infecting other employees of the firm with the virus.
*Sawyer's deteriorating health condition was known to Liberian authorities who placed him on a watch-list and restricted from making foreign trips during his period in quarantine.
*The same Sawyer, not being a staff of the Liberian Government and whose health was now terminally in decline due to EVD, surreptitiously, got himself nominated by the Liberian Government as a delegate to a regional conference of the Economic Community of West African States (ECOWAS) taking place in Calabar, south eastern Nigeria.
*At the Monrovia Airport on his departure for Nigeria, security surveillance facilities record Mr. Sawyer as being in serious pains and deliberately avoiding contact with other airport users.
* Upon arrival in Nigeria a few hours later, Mr. Sawyer, whose condition had deteriorated sharply, becomes quite generous with contact, embracing and shaking at will until he collapses in the waiting arms of Airport Health personnel, in the process viciously distributing the dreaded EVD to Airport Staff.
*Despite specific questions from medical staff at the high-brow hospital where he had been rushed to as to likely EVD connections, Mr. Sawyer deliberately lied to his care-givers that he had never had contact with anyone suffering from EVD. In execution of his devilish plot, Mr. Sawyer at one point, forcefully removed a medical device affixed to his persons and deliberately splattered his blood on the bodies of Nurses and Doctors giving him care – thus ensuring they contracted EVD. Within 2 weeks of contact with Mr. Sawyer, 4 of these medical personnel are now dead and over 200 secondary contacts are placed on quarantine or surveillance to monitor for possible EVD infection.
*Despite Mr. Sawyer’s deteriorating condition, officials of the Liberian Embassy in Nigeria made spirited efforts to forcefully secure his escape from the hospital, citing diplomatic immunity, on account that he had important functions to perform for the Liberian Government at the ECOWAS meeting in Calabar – the Hospital authorities declined, potentially saving Nigeria what would probably have been a more devastating outbreak of EVD.
*Sawyer died 5 days after his arrival in Nigeria. The EVD he brought along has set Nigeria on edge ever since: overstretching our already stressed public health infrastructure; costing incalculable sums in financial damages; the stigmatization of hundreds of Nigerians at home and abroad; creating disquiet amongst our civil populace; and several other continuing unsavory outcomes.
*Sawyer’s Minnesota, USA based-widow further complicates matters when she states that her husband (an American citizen with access to American health facilities) opted to travel to Nigeria with EVD because he had ‘confidence’ in the ability of the Nigerian healthcare system to ‘take care of him’. Really? Did Sawyer prefer Nigeria's healthcare system to his own country’s (the USA’s) system? Or is there something Mrs. Decontee Sawyer is keeping away from Nigerians and the international community?

Trite facts emanating from the Sawyer episode is that the attack was neither natural nor coincidental and that the deceased Liberian-American was not acting alone in his suicidal bioterroristic attack on Nigeria. Questions that directly emanate include:

1. Whodunnit?

2. Who stands to benefit, if there is actually any benefits to be derived therefrom?

3. Was someone worried that over 100 days after the outbreak of EVD in West Africa, the disease was yet to touch-base with Nigeria? A ‘hit’ that will, on account of the size of the Nigerian population, certainly galvanize more international attention for EVD?

4. Was this a test case? How will a country cope with many Sawyers arriving at different entry points all laden with human-borne biological or chemical weapons?

5. Is it feasible that several suicidal bioterrorists, in the mold of Mr. Sawyer, already resident in a given territory, deliberately infect themselves with an incurable infectious disease and proceed to ensure wide distribution of their disease condition?

The projections here are dire, and with present realities, real.




Picture: the Liberian-American, Mr. Patrick Sawyer, the harbinger of EVD to Nigeria.


Monday, August 11, 2014

Rooting for terror: #BringBackOurGirls = #BringBackOurTwinTowers

by Eze Eluchie

Listening to its leadership and observing its activities, one is convinced that if the characters behind the #BringBackOurGirls gang were American citizens, they would have set up a #BringBackOurTwinTowers ensemble soon after the dastardly 9-11 terrorist attacks, rallying to castigate the President George Bush presidency in the United States for inability to prevent or stop or rescue/resuscitate the victims of 9-11.

Matters get further complicated for the Nigerian Government with some civil society elements and a government agency (Human Right Commission) ever ready to lampoon Security agencies for efforts at tackling terror; this again would have been akin to Human Right Watch, Amnesty International and the US State Departments Annual Human Right Report on the United States equally castigating the US security forces and personnel for their robust war on terror, which often times led to rights violations of the rights of terrorists or suspected terrorists.

The Government and peoples of Nigeria are thus trapped in a ‘heads-we-lose-tails-they-win’ scenario with our war against terror.

The presence of vociferous, obstructionist and anarchist opposition who often times express tacit and clear support for terror in Nigeria, serve to compound the woes of our domestic authorities efforts at tackling terror. This again is comparable to a situation where the United States’ Democratic Party, which was in opposition when 9-11 occurred, to soon after the terrorists attacks on the United States, take upon itself the role of frustrating any and all State efforts to confront terror, inclusive of obstructing requests for funds to better equip the Security agencies.

The oddities highlighted in the Nigerian polity after the country came under sustained terror attacks by BH and like-minded groups, is not totally unexpected of a contraption founded on very faulty foundations. The contraption is perceived by most as a cow to be milked, and very few bother about such mundane matters as sustainability, propriety and patriotism.


The call for a holistic restructuring and renegotiation of the contraption is factored on the need to spare ourselves and particularly the West African sub-region, and beyond, of the dire consequences of our continuing folly – we do not have forever to do the needful.



Picture: Scene of a BH terror attack in northern Nigeria


Thursday, July 31, 2014

HIV/AIDS move over, the Big Boy is in town!

by Eze  Eluchie

Could there be any reasonable excuses why the World Health Organization and its partner public health agencies (particularly the Health Ministries) in the West African sub-region failed to initiate its Public Health Emergency of International Concern (PHEIC) protocols in a timely manner in response to the outbreak of the Ebola virus across several countries in West Africa?

In response to earlier outbreaks of SARS and the H1N1 viruses in Southeast Asia, WHO had responded with incredible dispatch, in one instance, producing a dubious report which encouraged countries across the world to spend billions of dollars procuring and stocking vaccines which eventually proved useless and a waste.

Is there any reason why the West African Health Organization (WAHO), an arm of the Economic Community of West African States (ECOWAS) failed to be proactive and live up to its responsibilities when the current outbreak of the Ebola virus transcended national borders for the first time in the history of the infirmity?

WAHO and Public Health administrators across the West African sub-region, with their penchant and reliance on donor grants for most of their activities, tend only to look into matters that their foreign funders prioritize, irrespective of the domestic needs.

For over a decade, basic health care issues afflicting the vast majority of the populations of sub-Saharan Africa, such as Malaria, Malnutrition, and Cholera were relegated to the background and emphasis and funding support was focused on the HIV/AIDS. In most countries across sub-Saharan Africa, the budget for HIV/AIDS surpasses, by a wide margin, the combined total of the Health Ministry and all other health projects.

With mortality rates that dwarf HIV/AIDS, and means of infection which elicits widespread fear in the population, Ebola presents itself as, and is actually, a far greater danger to society than AIDS ever was. Public Health practitioners are unfortunately faced with an unsavory ‘my-disease-is-worse-than-yours’ situation. Enhancing the quality of life of peoples via good quality education, high public hygiene standards, provision of adequate preventive and primary health care services and facilities, rather than near-exclusive focus on particular ‘fashionable’ diseases will best serve the health interest of any population.


It is hoped that the ongoing experience of the response to the ongoing Ebola outbreak will afford an opportunity to critically examine domestic health crisis response mechanism in Africa to forestall a repeat of the ongoing disaster.




Picture: Gloves and other apparel used by medical personnel tackling Ebola virus washed and left to dry for subsequent reuse – dearth of resources makes it impossible for disposables to be used. Not so for HIV/AIDS.  it is unfortunate those on the frontline of tackling Ebola have to recycle such materials. Disposables would have been far more hygienic. (an AFP Photo/Seyllou. Taken at Guekedou, Guinea, West Africa. April 2014)